California’s Debate on Marriage Definition, Justices Rule that PROPOSITION 8 STANDS!!
The Justices have been in deliberation for months, and now comes the announcement. The proposition stands.
Thank goodness. When the Justices stated that gay folks were given the same exact rights with domestic partnership’s as with married couples, why would they overturn the will of the majority of voters just over the definition of a word? Amen. Yes why would they? To destroy the 1st Amendment would have been the reason, opening up the courts to then proceed to "make law respecting the establishment of religion or the free exercise thereof" which the 1st Amendment prohibits Congress from doing.
This bought us time. Beautiful California will be held back from severe judgments that I believe will begin to fall upon mankind, even those predicted by "ancient and modern prophets" if we fail to uphold the Family, permitting it’s continued destruction. I have a conviction of such warnings as put forth by modern and living prophets of Jesus of Nazareth. They stated His doctrine and that if His Father (as well as our father) concerning the family here:
http://www.awakeandarise.org/article/Proclamation.htm
To those who think this is not a "fair minded decision" they must admit that religious people were not out working against legal language against "domestic partnership’s." But legal defense was a necessity for the word "marriage" as defined by government in order to keep the tyranny of the state from oppressing religion and opening religious people and churches to full board persecution by the State as occurred to the Mormon’s in the 19th Century with murder of leadership, extermination orders, steeling, looting, robbing of property, vile raping, murdering mobs with government endorsement and connections. May such days never be seen again in America. (Though Waco Texas in 1993 was another such vile show of government sponsored murder upon the innocent.)
